tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5287053601633794732.post8962743395700335048..comments2023-09-15T08:29:17.848-07:00Comments on FLUORIDE FREE WATER: Dr Robert Grimes unscientific opinions are a threat to public health.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5287053601633794732.post-86914235664100120502014-03-16T11:21:24.911-07:002014-03-16T11:21:24.911-07:00I agree. I am all for science and genuine skeptici...I agree. I am all for science and genuine skepticism, but the skepticism of people like David Robert Grimes is rather militant and prejudiced, and thus difficult to take seriously. He tends to write good articles on social issues, but the article he wrote on water fluoridation was highly dubious. For example, he failed to mention a lot of related counter-arguments (e.g. proven negative synergistic effects of lead uptake in developing brains when exposed to fluoride) and he selectively uses data sets. See this article published in The Lancet which names fluoride as a toxin in neurological development: http://download.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/laneur/PIIS1474442213702783.pdf?id=eaaQK7ctyw93Lb0ZPhqruAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5287053601633794732.post-84800721617629766492014-01-21T12:40:30.521-08:002014-01-21T12:40:30.521-08:00Well said. David Robert Grimes gives science a bad...Well said. David Robert Grimes gives science a bad name - his scepticism is prejudiced, and therefore, not true. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com